"Why didn't they just shoot him in the leg?"
We heard people ask this question in the Michael Brown shooting, the death of Tamir Rice, and more recently in the death of Robert "LaVoy" Finicum.
Occasionally we'll hear a slight variation of that, asking why the suspect wasn't shot in the arm, but they're both ways of asking police to shoot at the extremities of the body, in the mistaken belief that shooting someone in the arm or leg is somehow guaranteed to be less lethal.
That's simply not true.
Illustration of the vascular system, separating the arterial and venous systems. Note major arteries and veins run through the upper legs and arms. |
Getting shot in the leg or arm can be just as deadly as a shot to the torso as bullets fragment or change directions after hitting tissue and bone, and either can kill in seconds to minutes.
If you have a particularly strong stomach, there is edited video of a man being shot in the center of his upper thigh with a G3-style .308 rifle that has been posted to YouTube. He's shot in the right thigh 11 seconds into this video (warning: extremely graphic). In the unedited, full length version (which you simply don't need to see) he dies in roughly three minutes. The same could happen to upper arm or shoulder shots… the same "flesh wounds" that Hollywood movie and television stars all but brush off as no big deal.
Here in reality, such shots can be a very big deal. Let's be very clear on this: when a human being is shot in the arm or leg, they could very easily die from the wound, and there is no way to easily predict what the bullet is going to do once it hits a human body.
The second reason that we don't shoot at arms and legs is a based on the facts that:
- arms and legs tend to be smaller targets than a torso, and in more motion than a torso (it's harder to hit a smaller, rapidly moving target like running legs or swinging arms)
- Arms and legs are not as think or dense as torsos.
- Defensive handgun bullets are designed to penetrate roughly 12″-18″ in people.
Officers and civilians shooting at arms and legs are more likely to miss the targeted individual completely, and even if they make a hit on arms and legs, these smaller parts of the body are unlikely to stop a bullet. these slowed bullets are still quite lethal, as a recent shooting in Chicago proved.
Quintonio LeGrier allegedly swung a baseball bat at Chicago Police officer Robert Rialmo twice the day after Christmas, missing him by inches. When LeGrier cocked the improvised weapon back for a third swing, Rialmo drew his weapon and quickly fired it eight times from retention. One of the bullets passed through LeGrier and hit neighbor Bettie Jones, killing her.
Law enforcement officers and properly-trained defensive firearms students do not "shoot them in the leg" because:
- You are only legally justified in shooting at people who are immediate lethal force threats, and the most effective was to stop such a threat (and hopefully fire the fewest rounds) is a center mass hit.
- Arms and legs are harder targets to hit.
- Arms and legs won't reliably stop bullets, and so shots at them pose a greater risk of hitting innocent bystanders.
- Arm and leg shots can be just as lethal as a shot to the chest, depending on what the bullet hits and how it reacts to hitting the body.
Please stop asking people to take shots that will put more lives at risk.
------------------
Bob Owens is the Editor of BearingArms.com. A long-time shooting enthusiast, he began blogging as a North Carolina native in New York. His personal blog is bob-owens.com, and he can be found on Twitter at @bob_owens.
Tags: arms instruction, shoot at body mass, not arms, not legs, Bob Owens, Bearing Arms To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment