First, the supervisors attempt to redefine terms according to their Leftist lexicon. Even people who strongly disagree with the NRA would have trouble calling it a domestic terrorist organization. Moreover, terrorism is not a viewpoint. It is a terrorist action. Jim Geraghty put it this way: "Being a member of Occupy Wall Street does not make you a terrorist. Being a member of Occupy Wall Street and planning to blow up a bridge makes you a terrorist."
Second, the supervisors order city employees to "take every reasonable step to limit" business interactions with the NRA and its supporters. Does that apply to someone who has a contract with the city who is on the membership roll of the NRA? Jim Geraghty wonders if the city would cancel a contract with a company that provides orange traffic cones because someone in the company supported the NRA.
Third, the supervisors also urge "other cities to follow their example." If they are successful in getting other cities to join them, the NRA might have difficulty scheduling conventions, workshops, or even gun safety seminars in various cities.
For those of you who hate the NRA and approve of these actions, let me ask you a question. How would you feel if a conservative city council or board of supervisors labeled the ACLU, CAIR, or a number of other groups this way? I think that illustrates what is wrong with this rash decision by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.
----------------
Kerby Anderson (@kerbyanderson) is a radio talk show host heard on numerous stations via the Point of View Network (@PointofViewRTS) and is endorsed by Dr. Bill Smith, Editor, ARRA News Service.
Tags: Kerby Anderson, Viewpoints, Point of View, Domestic Terrorists? To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment