A hotter topic in philosophy?
Räsänen has had a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, a peer-reviewed academic publication. Entitled "Moral case for legal age change," it has attracted attention.
To be expected when you write something this absurd: "Should a person who feels his legal age does not correspond with his experienced age be allowed to change his legal age?"
Well, the question answers itself.
No.
But Räsänen answers yes, "in some cases people should be allowed to change their legal age." He lists those cases as when
- "the person genuinely feels his age differs significantly from his chronological age"
- "the person's biological age is recognised to be significantly different from his chronological age"
- "age change would likely prevent, stop or reduce ageism, discrimination due to age, he would otherwise face."
------------------
Paul Jacob (@Common_Sense_PJ ) is author of Common Sense which provides daily commentary about the issues impacting America and about the citizens who are doing something about them. He is also President of the Liberty Initiative Fund (LIFe) as well as Citizens in Charge Foundation. Jacob is a contributing author on the ARRA News Service.
Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, Trans-Philosophical To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Source

No comments:
Post a Comment