![]() |
Dutch free traders in Harbor Scene by Abraham Storck (1644–1708) |
Actual question. I am not in the least bit interested in gotchas, here. I am willing to celebrate USMCA when (a) I can make sense of it and (b) it proves not just more of the same.
The thing I liked best about NAFTA was that it had "Free Trade" in the title. I like free trade. Trade is good; freedom is good. It is not generally bad to trade with Mexico and Canada — for Mexicans, Canadians, and Americans. I simply have trouble believing that politicians and their aides (along with overly-friendly lobbyists) know better than market competition what the terms of those zillions of deals should be.
But I freely admit, what I didn't like about NAFTA was that there was more "free trade" in the title than in the agreement itself.
NAFTA was managed trade.
As far as I can make out, so is USMCA.
Oddly, I just heard two of the three Daily Wire guys* praising USMCA for setting quotas on how much of what can be produced where.
Quotas and mandates and the like are not free trade.
"Managed trade" is just another way of saying "protectionism." Savvy politicians don't even like calling it "managed trade." They call it "fair trade."
Free trade is fair enough. Politicians' "fair trade" isn't free enough.
This is Common Sense. I'm Paul Jacob.
* Andrew Klavan and Michael Knowles, recent podcasts: dailywire.com.
------------------
Paul Jacob is author of Common Sense which provides daily commentary about the issues impacting America and about the citizens who are doing something about them. He is also President of the Liberty Initiative Fund (LIFe) as well as Citizens in Charge Foundation. Jacob is a contributing author on the ARRA News Service.
Tags: Paul Jacob, Common Sense, More of the Same To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
Source

No comments:
Post a Comment