![]() |
| A hydraulic fracturing site located atop the Marcellus shale rock formation in Pennsylvania. Photo: Ty Wright/Bloomberg. |
EPA looked at scientific studies, government, NGO, and industry data and concluded that hydraulic fracturing has not had "widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water."
For those of us closely involved in the debate over shale energy, this report simply reaffirms what previous science has shown, as Katie Brown explains at Energy In Depth:
In light of EPA's study, some people have some reevaluating to do:
- Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) should rethink his 2014 ban on hydraulic fracturing.
- Local communities in Colorado, Texas, and elsewhere should stop denying science and think twice before passing local hydraulic fracturing bans.
- The Interior Department needs to reconsider its hydraulic fracturing regulations for federal lands.
- Josh Fox, director of the discredited documentaries Gasland and Gasland 2, should work on a new documentary correcting all the falsehoods in his previous films.
As for hydraulic fracturing opponents, they need to stop denying the science.
---------------
Sean Hackbarth is a policy advocate and Senior Editor at U.S Chamber of Commerce. He twitters at @seanhackbarth and is a contributing author at the ARRA News Service.
Tags: EPA, Science, Hydralic Fracturing, no threat, drainking water, reports, Sean Hackbarth, Chamber of Commerce To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. and "Like" Facebook Page - Thanks!
No comments:
Post a Comment